Wake Up, Philippines!

What a mess!

Posted in Dangerous Drugs, DOJ, Drug Trafficking, PDEA by Erineus on February 18, 2009

The exchange of accusations between the Brodett clan members has made the “Alabang Boys” controversy look even messier with many side issues cropping up, pretty much like a telenovela with complex subplots featuring assorted characters. But fascinating as the revelations are — such as revenge being the motive, a marijuana-using mother, a mentally unstable sister-in-law; an undisclosed “mistah” bribing a PDEA official whose humble beginning must have made him biased against the rich — people must look at the whole issue with objectivity and not be swayed by emotion and conjecture.

Was the buy-bust operation and the subsequent arrest legal and by the book? Is the evidence against the “Alabang Boys” admissible? Was the resolution for the dismissal of the case valid? Is there tangible proof of bribery? Who did the bribing? Are the suspects really big-time drug pushers with international connections? These are questions that must be answered. But when one starts putting the issues and the people involved under the glare of publicity, then things can really get out of hand. It would be difficult to resolve these issues with impartiality because those involved would be more concerned about making themselves look clean to save their reputation. After all, the opinion of people can be colored by hearsay, their conclusions tainted by perception rather than facts or clear evidence as provided for by law.

No doubt everybody is being fried without the oil, so to speak. But what is becoming clear in this whole tangled drama is the need to review the law regarding illegal drugs and fixing the kinks in the system by drafting legislation that would put an end to the perennial conflict between PDEA enforcers and DOJ prosecutors. The proposal of Dangerous Drugs Board Chairman Tito Sotto to deploy DOJ prosecutors in PDEA specifically for drug-related cases makes a lot of sense. This way, state prosecutors could coordinate more closely with PDEA agents and advise the latter on legal aspects such as how arrests should be conducted, whether operatives can jump over the fence of a suspect’s house without being charged with trespassing, and other possible technicalities so that charges will not end up getting dismissed later on.

Aside from encouraging PDEA and DOJ people to work closely with each other, Tito’s proposal will put an end to accusations that state prosecutors are bribed to dismiss the case, and counter-accusations that PDEA agents are bumbling idiots who are not familiar with legal procedures. Even the 2008 US International Narcotics Control Strategy Report has noted that “pervasive problems in law enforcement and criminal justice system such as corruption, low morale, inadequate resources and salaries, and lack of cooperation between police and prosecutors also hamper drug prosecutions.”

The publicity surrounding the “Alabang Boys” has caught the attention of international drug agencies like the US Drug Enforcement Administration which is closely watching developments and monitoring how this will be handled by the government. No doubt this will affect Philippine relations with other countries since drug trafficking and terrorism are closely related, whose repercussions are far more serious than people think.

Drug trafficking is a transnational crime, and the Philippines has been pinpointed as an international transshipment point. Traffickers find our porous borders, un-patrolled shores and uninhabited islands a haven for their illegal trade. According to the 2008 US-INCSR, the Philippines is a source of methamphetamine (shabu) exported to Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea and the US, and that chemicals for manufacturing illegal drugs are smuggled into the Philippines from China and India.

In any case, it’s about time we realized the enormity of the drug menace in this country. The report by the UN Office on Drugs and Crimes citing the Philippines as the country with the most number of drug users in South East Asia — estimated at 6.7 million — makes the Philippines a very attractive market for international drug traffickers, many of them from China and Hong Kong. With the number of Filipinos now estimated at 92 million, the figures could get higher and the situation worse considering that the youth comprise more than 40 percent of our population. Some sources even claim that close to 10 million Filipinos are drug addicts, with majority belonging to the 14-25 age bracket.

I personally know of young people whose lives were destroyed or worse, are now six feet under because of drugs. Pushers and traffickers mostly target people from well-to-do families, celebrities and others who can afford the stiff price of shabu, ketamine, Ecstasy and other illegal substances, but they also go for students and lower income groups. Statistics show that up to 80 percent of heinous crimes like rape and murder are drug-related with perpetrators usually high on drugs. That’s why people are beginning to rethink their position regarding the reimposition of the death penalty especially for convicted drug traffickers. Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia carry the death penalty for drug trafficking — and it’s a no-brainer why the number of drug-related crimes in these countries is low compared to the Philippines. Though they’re behind bars, traffickers — especially big-time ones — could still operate and even have an opportunity to expand their network when their cellmates are released.

At the very least, this whole messy and scandalous affair is focusing attention on the major problem of drugs that has plagued us for so many years. This is far more serious than most people think, and the government and the country’s entire leadership must have the political will to fight this growing menace. Everyone must not lose sight of the fact that the drug problem is slowly destroying this country and gradually eroding our reputation by giving us the dubious honor of being known as Asia’s drug capital.

* * *

E-mail: babeseyeview@yahoo.com
View previous articles of this column.

By Babe Romualdez

Updated January 11, 2009 12:00 AM

A matter of view?

THE World Bank (WB) is a specialized agency of the UN system, established in 1944. It encompasses two development institutions and three affiliates focused on worldwide poverty reduction.

Helping poor nations

The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) is WB’s main component that provides loans and technical assistance for projects in developing – poor – member countries, like RP, and encourages co-financing for projects from other countries or a syndication of dozens of giant commercial banks in the US and Europe.

Huge loans

Most big infrastructures in RP are funded with loans by the billions of pesos from IBRD, that in turn urges big commercial banks in Europe by the dozens to invest here.

One bridge or highway project here costing R500M needs a long-term loan of .52 million. The World Bank will then encourage other giant banks in Switzerland, Paris, London, Berlin, New York, etc. to share in meeting the loan and its terms.

One or two banks may not loan more than R500M to RP.


Disclosures of IBRD that some Filipino contractors and politicians connive or help each other to “corner” contracts via acts amounting to fraud, conflict of interest, influence peddling and other fraudulent means serve as notice/revelation to the lending banks.

The above places RP on the banks’ blacklist of nations notoriously engaged in making net loans result in inferior bridge or road called by honest builders as “matapang sa buhangin.” The same notice or knowledge is not forgotten for years by nations that apply their IBRD loans with unassailable honesty.

Just an image

This was probably the start of RP’s unkind image of having corrupt high officials, national and local, and of wasting loans from IBRD and other sources encouraged by the World Bank Group.

Our high officials and politicians were “splendidly quick” in denying allegations of contract “rigging, fixing and spinning yarns or wizardry.” They – officials and contractors – angrily disputed the lending bank’s official list of shadowy contractors and questioned results of a long investigation by independent experts.


The bank officials did not answer the rage/anger of blacklisted contractors and their protectors. Neither did it refer to blacklisted contractors considered by DPWH officials/engineers as truly friendly and kind and thoughtful and honest – of all things – all the time.

Unkind words

And all 91.8M of us don’t know what epithets and unkind words are being thrown by lending banks in our way for years.

Let’s not forget that a syndication of banks is like a club and can influence other banks in Europe and in the US not to give RP loans of any kind in years.

But let’s not be too harsh on DoJ investigators and the NBI if they call World Bank investigations without basis or based on unreliable evidence like the findings favorable to dirty little crooks selling drugs.

Lacks ‘audacity’

The two agencies combined, including other good agencies, cannot summon Obama’s audacity to take a closer look at disbursements called pork or view a few bottles of liquid fertilizer (replaced by deepwell water) but commanded a price amounting to 1000 percent (or 10 times) of the normal price tag.

Lender’s view

DoJ and NBI conclusions with respect to PDEA’s arrests of drug traders they considered innocent are now under review by a commission headed by a retired and distinguished Supreme Court justice. (Comments are welcome at roming@pefianco.com)

Author: Atty. Romeo V. Pefianco